Bidding Blog Posts

PPC Advertising – Where Is The Sweet Spot?

Tuesday, August 21st, 2007

Bidding

Ask most people what the answer to this question is, and they’ll reel off an answer like œfourth or œsecond, but I think it’s fairly clear that the question is much more complex than that , after all, fourth place is going to be quite expensive on competitive terms, and if your site has a low conversion rate, you could easily lose money. On the other hand, if the term has few people bidding on it, then a higher position will only cost a few pence more and generate loads more conversions. And you can’t really answer the question until you’ve decided what your objective is , do you want to generate as many conversions as you can for your budget, generate as many conversions as you can given a maximum fixed cost per conversion, maximise your return on investment, maximise your profit, get the highest position that you can without throwing away money in order to raise brand awareness, or something else? And surely it has to depend on what your rivals are doing, doesn’t it? Are the people above you serious competition, or just people with lots of money and no idea what they’re doing? Are you trying to ˜beat’ these people, or make money? Clearly, a simple one word answer isn’t quite going to cut it¦ Before answering the question, there are a number of general rules of thumb that can be applied to PPC adverts.

  1. The higher your advert appears, the more clicks you will get (always true)
  2. The higher your advert appears, the more you pay per click (always true)
  3. The higher your advert appears, the lower your conversion rate will be (usually true)

Obviously, the text of your advert has an impact on all of these, but for the purposes of this blog, we’ll assume that you have a single advert. Cost per conversion is generally a good measurement of the effectiveness of your campaign , it would be nice to analyse profit, or even a ratio of cost:demand, but unless you’ve got the tools to do this, the best you are likely to get is cost per conversion. Cost per conversion can be calculated by dividing the cost per click by the conversion rate (conversions per click). Since we’ve stated that higher positions have higher cost per click AND lower conversion rate, it must therefore be true that the higher your ad appears, the more you have to pay per conversion. So if your objective was to minimise the cost per conversion, or maximise your return on investment (which is pretty much the same thing if you don’t know your conversion value), then the simple answer is that your advert should appear last! But that seems a bit silly, so perhaps this shouldn’t be your objective after all¦ Clearly, it’s better to make a £1 from 100 people that to make a £5 from one person. So, from a purely analytical perspective, maximising your ˜profit’ has to be the way forward. If you are advertising for other reasons, such as raising brand awareness, then you may be willing to make less profit, in order to be seen by more people , but even so, the rest of this document is still important, so don’t leave yet! The problem with profit, as I’ve already intimated, is that unless you know your margin and order value, you can’t actually calculate it. And what if you are generating leads? They don’t have a value or margin, do they? Well, you can’t calculate it exactly, but you need some kind of idea what you will make from a conversion, or you’ll never be able to tell what the ˜best’ position is. In a nutshell, how much can you pay for a conversion, and still break even? If you can’t put a figure on this, you need to think hard about what you are actually trying to achieve with the campaign , it can’t be to make money! I’ll assume that you’ve got a number , it doesn’t need to be exact, even a ballpark figure will be adequate for identifying your sweet spot. What else do you need? Well, we’ve said that the conversion rate increases as you move down the results, and that the clickthrough rate and cost per click fall. You need to put numbers to this. Something along the lines of:

Position Clickthru Rate Conversion Rate Cost/Click
1 10% 1.0% £1.50
2 8% 1.2% £1.30
3 6% 1.4% £1.10
4 4% 1.6% £1.00
5 2% 1.7% £0.90

etc Don’t use the numbers above, I’ve just made them up, and they will be different for each campaign, and probably even each adgroup or even each keyword. Again, these will have to be estimates, but by looking at the performance of keywords over time you can get some idea. If you really get stuck, change your cost per clicks every day or two for a few weeks, and get estimates that way. Once you’ve got this table, calculate the cost per conversion (by dividing the cost per click by the conversion rate). Subtract this from your approximate income per conversion (take into account the cost of the goods/services!), and you get the ˜profit’ per conversion. So for the above figures, with product that retails for £150, with a cost to you of £75, the results would be:

Position Profit/Conversion
1 £75 , (£1.50/1.0%) = -£75
2 £75 , (£1.30/1.2%) = -£33
3 £75 , (£1.10/1.4%) = -£4
4 £75 , (£1.00/1.6%) = £13
5 £75 , (£0.90/1.7%) = £22

etc As mentioned earlier, this will always increase, as you move further down the rankings. It should also level out quite quickly , the cost per click for 11th and 20th are usually reasonably close together, and clickthrough rates won’t vary too much either¦ Next, multiply this by the conversion rate (to get the profit per click) then the clickthrough rate. This will turn the profit per conversion into the profit per impression. Multiply this in turn by the impressions per day (or month or year) to get the profit over that period. Here, we’ll assume 1000 impressions per day.

Position Profit/Impression Profit/Day
1 (-£75*1.0%*10%) = -£0.075 -£75.00
2 (-£33*1.2%*8%) = -£0.032 -£32.00
3 (-£4*1.4%*6%) = -£0.003 -£3.00
4 (£13*1.6%*4%) = £0.008 £8.00
5 (£22*1.7%*2%) = £0.0075 £7.50

You can multiply this by the number of impressions, in order to get a daily profit/loss for each position if you like, but in terms of finding the sweet spot, this isn’t really necessary. So, in the above example, the sweet spot is 4th, though any position below fourth will also show a small profit (as the income for each unit sold will always be more than the cost below this point). Is all this work worth it? Perhaps not, if you are in fourth position, and haven’t got the budget to move into first or second , but the general rule is very useful. If you lower your bid, you’ll get fewer conversions, but each one will cost less, and if you raise it, you’ll get more conversions, but each one will cost a bit more. What you will find, is that there are few situations where the top position is the most profitable , even if your site converts better than your competitors, your advert has a better clickthrough rate, and your margin on sales and average order value are better, you are still relying on them to do the same calculations that you have , otherwise they could be bidding over the odds, and competing with them just means that you lose money, they lose money and Google gets richer!

Why Making Money On Competitive Terms Is No Harder Than On Uncompetitive Terms

Wednesday, July 18th, 2007

Advert Text, Bidding, Dynamic Keyword Insertion, Google Adwords

Seriously, if you are using the ‘sweet-spot’ approach to decide what position your advert should appear in, the amount that everyone else is bidding makes no difference to whether your campaign makes money. It does, however, affect how much money you can make. Not convinced? Look at the following example. Take the following two search terms. The profit from a sale, and the total traffic is the same on both. So are the clickthrough rates in different positions and the conversion rate. The only thing that’s different is the cost per click of appearing in each position.

Position Cost/Click Clickthru Rate Conv. Rate Impressions Clicks Conversions Profit
1 £1.00 15% 6% 1500 225 14 £45.00
2 £0.90 12% 5% 1200 144 7 £14.40
3 £0.80 10% 5% 1000 100 5 £20.00
4 £0.70 9% 5% 900 81 4 £24.30
5 £0.60 8% 5% 800 64 3 £25.60
6 £0.55 7% 5% 700 49 2 £22.05
7 £0.50 6% 5% 600 36 2 £18.00
8 £0.45 5% 5% 500 25 1 £13.75
9 £0.40 4% 5% 400 16 1 £9.60
10 £0.35 3% 5% 300 9 0 £5.85
Position Cost/Click Clickthru Rate Conv. Rate Impressions Clicks Conversions Profit
1 £2.00 15% 6% 1500 225 14 -£225
2 £1.80 12% 5% 1200 144 7 -£115
3 £1.60 10% 5% 1000 100 5 -£60
4 £1.40 9% 5% 900 81 4 -£32
5 £1.20 8% 5% 800 64 3 -£13
6 £1.00 7% 5% 700 49 2 £0
7 £0.80 6% 5% 600 36 2 £7
8 £0.60 5% 5% 500 25 1 £10
9 £0.50 4% 5% 400 16 1 £8
10 £0.40 3% 5% 300 9 0 £5

In the first case, the sweet spot is in fifth place (profit = £26), and in the second case, it’s eighth (profit = £10). But in both cases, the Cost Per Click is the same. This is because the optimal cost per click has nothing whatsoever to do with the number of clicks or conversions that you get – it’s purely dependent on the conversion rate, cost per click and the profit (exc. the ad cost) you make on a sale. And these things are totally independent of where your advert appears in the search results. It’s not that surprising really, if you think about it. If your cost per conversion is lower that your profit per conversion, you make money – otherwise you don’t. And cost per conversion can be expressed as cpc/conversion rate. Since the conversion rate is (usually) unaffected by result position, then a cpc will be profitable or not irrespective of your position in the results. One interesting implication of this is that it answers the question – “what should I do if somebody jumps above me in the search results?”. The answer is of course (!) that you should do nothing, and accept the reduced profit (my blog on the numpties makes a lot of sense, doesn’t it!). In summary, ignore what everyone else is doing – work out the right bid for you, and stick to it.

PPC – How The Numpties Are Ruining It For Everyone

Friday, June 29th, 2007

Advert Text, Bidding, Google Adwords, Pay Per Action

I’m sorry, but they are. They are losing out, we are losing out, and the customers are losing out. Google’s doing alright out of it, but then they always seem to!

Here’s what’s happening. Picture the scene , a big company decides it’s time to advertise on Google, so they call up their analytical people, and ask them to make it happen. Perhaps they call a few PPC agencies to get some quotes, perhaps they don’t, but either way, they decide to do it themselves (how hard can it be?). They read up on Adwords, maybe even do the Google exam (or maybe not) and launch themselves into it. So what happens next? They work out how much they have to bid to get to the top of the search, and bid that. Maybe they get their wordy people to write some adverts, and away they go. Needless to say, they are losing money more often than not. But why should the rest of us care? They’ve got plenty of cash, and if they want to give it away, let them. Maybe this was true in the past with poor advertising campaigns , after all, if a big retailer puts a bad advert on the TV, or in a magazine, it doesn’t affect anyone else. But this is PPC , and the whole concept is based around an auction. If you’re paying £0.50 per click, and appearing fourth, then somebody else appears and pays £5 per click to appear first, you’ll drop down to fifth. And get less clicks. And make less money. And if you’re an agency, working on behalf of a client, all they know is that they are getting less traffic, making less money and their rival is top of the pile , try explaining to them that you know what you’re doing and the competition don’t. Suddenly everyone’s under pressure to increase their bids or lose traffic , and every time somebody increases their bids, they make the whole problem worse. It’s called inflation, and as long as there are have-a-go companies jumping onto the PPC bandwagon, it’s here to stay. The solution? There isn’t one, really. You do the maths, and stick to your sweet spot, and accept that your campaign has just become less profitable. Now imagine if you will, a world where everyone does the maths or hires a good agency to do the sums for them (and, believe it or not, most agencies don’t bother, they just guess). Suddenly, everyone is paying according to their site’s conversion rate , the more likely your clicks are to convert, the more you can afford to pay. So the sites that most closely match customer requirements win, and the ones that don’t, lose. The customer is happy as they are finding what they want, Google is happy, because it delivers relevant results, agencies are happy, because they can compete, not with unlimited budgets and silly bids, but by optimising the campaigns better. Everyone wins, except the people with poor websites or uncompetitive prices. Will this ever happen, or is this just a dream? I’d like to think that one day it’ll happen. Google are trying to make it clearer how the whole thing works (whilst not leaving their processes open to abuse), and over time, I think that people will learn to use this new medium. But it won’t be soon. There are still agencies out there that take the money and do nothing in return, and agencies that simply don’t understand well enough how to make campaigns truly successful. So, for the time being at least, we’ll just have to keep explaining to customers why, contrary to intuition, top of the table is not the best place to be.