Malcolm's thoughts

Panda Farming for Beginners: Demystifying The Google Panda Farmer Update

Malcolm has been working in Search since 2005, when he joined Epiphany as the first employee. His speciality is technical SEO. Malcolm likes to think of himself as an “approachable nerd”, able to talk equally well to social and technical audiences.

Back to contents page

With all the talk within the Search Engine Marketing Industry about Pandas and Farmers, you could be forgiven for thinking that Panda Farming was a new strand to SEM. In fact, Panda is the code name for the latest Google algorithm update which is causing a stir within US results. With its imminent UK release, let’s have a look at the details around this latest update, and what we can expect when it is rolled out to the UK and the rest of the world.

Let’s Demystify Google Panda Farming

For a while now, more and more dubious results have been starting to appear within Google’s SERPs. It seemed as though every algorithm update that Google applied to improve the results in the head also dragged up more poor quality content into the mid and long tail. This combined with the overall increase in length of search query used by Google users meant that more and more people were being exposed to less than ideal content.

The main purveyors of this less-than-ideal content are known as Content Farms. These sites scrape trend and search volume data, and produce content around subjects deemed valuable enough to warrant the five minutes it takes them to produce the content. As you can imagine, in most cases this five-minute content is stock, poor quality or incomplete.

This of course isn’t much of a problem for the Content Farms. Their main purpose is usually to drive people to Google Adsense or similar advertising, rather than to become your favourite destination for helpful advice and information on a particular subject. For users though, Google has let them down and not fulfilled its main goal of providing the best content for a particular search. Bad Google!

So in February 2011, Google launched the Panda update (although we in the industry were calling it the Farmer update as it was aimed at Content Farms), with the aim of addressing this rise in low quality content within its results.

The Effects of the Panda Update

The main impact of the Google Panda / Farmer update is the removal of rankings for content that is deemed ‘thin.’ By ‘thin,’ we mean content that is either incomplete, offers no added value or is simply a duplicate of other content already present on the Web.

It is pretty easy for Google to make an assumption on whether a particular piece of content is thin based on document classification, duplicate content filtering and user behaviour. These three are known to be the main areas that Google is looking into with comments like:

“As we’ve increased both our size and freshness in recent months, we’ve naturally indexed a lot of good content and some spam as well. To respond to that challenge, we recently launched a redesigned document-level classifier that makes it harder for spammy on-page content to rank highly. The new classifier is better at detecting spam on individual web pages, e.g., repeated spammy words—the sort of phrases you tend to see in junky, automated, self-promoting blog comments.”

From Google’s Matt Cutts – Google search and search engine spam

So if you yourself are running a content driven site and not putting any effort into the content you create, then you could be at risk when the Panda hits the UK.

As a knock-on effect from Panda, you may also see a drop in rankings if a substantial part of your historic link-building has been around weak content creation. While article submission can be a great way of generating an initial buzz or indexing, it should be just that. If your existing rankings are based on huge amounts of content being pushed out to article sites on a regular basis, you may be about to lose a large portion of your back-link profile (if you haven’t already), as these sites feel the impact of the Panda update.

What Can You Do to Protect Yourself from Pandas?

The first thing you need to consider when preparing your site against the Panda update is “what is the purpose and condition of my content?”  If your content is stock (as is the case with many e-commerce sites), or just a quick rewrite of content found on every other site in your niche, you may be in trouble. If you have taken the time to think of ways to make your content unique and useful for your users, you should be fine.

As we at Epiphany have said for a long time, “Content is a benefit for SEO but should not be created for that purpose alone.” You need to consider how users will perceive the content and actually want them to read it. Your content should reflect your brand and stand out; Five minutes rarely makes great content.

On top of this, if your back-links all come from links embedded in articles you have scattered across the Web, you may be in for some tough times ahead if those links were having any benefit in the first place. I have already alluded to our stance on article submissions, but to reiterate, article submissions have a purpose but it isn’t to get great links or develop a solid brand link profile. If you are using it for this then erm… good luck.

To Conclude

The Google Panda / Farmer update is a positive thing and should help people get into the correct mindset about content creation. The update is not aimed at legitimate sites, and any sites that have been impacted unfairly have been reviewed and the issues resolved by recent tweaks. To sum the whole thing up in a single qwerky paragraph:

“Pandas only eat Bamboo, so as long as your website isn’t made of Bamboo you will be fine. At Epiphany we help you make your site a monolith of Granite that is impervious to Pandas (and apparently Bacteria), therefore our clients need not fear the Google Panda update!”

8 Responses to “Panda Farming for Beginners: Demystifying The Google Panda Farmer Update”

  1. Suzanne McDonald says:

    You know a good post when, after reading, you have a good understanding of a complicated subject. And what could be more complicated than deciphering Google algos?

    All is not lost for sites that took a Panda hit, however. We’re in the midst of content rehab for a client who’s lost a significant amount of traffic. When we’re done, the site will be far better for its visitors, which is good for business.

    The great news is Google is better for users & the sites that value their visitors’ time will benefit.

  2. Mtron says:

    “Content Rehab” what an excellent way of putting it Suzanne. Getting people into the right mindset regarding content creation and especially creative content creation seems to be the biggest hurdle in our industry at the moment. “Innovate don’t replicate” is a phrase I hear very often around the office. I also use “Shortcuts lead to shortfalls”.

    Panda has been a wake up call for many, but brands who have taken their web presence seriously and taken the time to reinforce their brand loyalty online will be reaping huge rewards.

    Now all we need to do is work on those god awful exact match domains :)

  3. Suzanne McDonald says:

    I hear exact-match domains are going to get theirs!

  4. olsen jay nelson says:

    Hi, I just heard about panda before making my way here. Great post. I’m wondering about areas such as in the publishing industry where synopses and excerpts etc are replicated at different online bookstores, author sites, and blog tour blogs etc. All this serves an important purpose and is informative for people, so is panda going to target this as well, or will it be deemed acceptable as long as it adds value with its function and/or the additional original content that supports it?

    Also, when a snippet of original content from site A is used by site B to hijack search results for site A and there is none of this promised content or even a reference to site A when clicked through (parasitic search content), is this another form of content farming that will be handled by panda, or is that a problem that’s yet to be solved?

    Thanks for your post,

    Olsen

  5. Mtron says:

    Hi Olsen, what you are saying is exactly spot on and applies to a large range of e-commerce sites in general. Lets say every book site had a page on Terry Pratchetts Mort with exactly the same core content. Google will already be making certain assumptions as to whether some are pure duplicate content and removing or devaluing those. We then end up with a list of sites that are ranked via other factors and returned when we search.

    In the above scenario Panda should affect all of the sites equally and in turn have no effect on the rankings as they are all copies so they all suffer the same devalution and therefore nothing really changes.

    It gets interesting when you start to consider the fact that they won’t be all exactly identical. Apply that and Panda is likely to do some minor re-ordering of results.

    If we take this even further and someone has taken the time to rewrite their review, added user generated content etc. to the page. This site will not be affected by Panda and will therefore benefit from the fact its rival will.

    Panda is an attempt to devalue cookie cutter techniques that aren’t supported by value added content. If everyone sets up a site and all of their content comes from a feed (as happens a lot with e-commerce sites and affiliates) and leaves it as that, these sites offer nothing that can’t be found elsewhere and will therefore (rightfully) be hit over sites that have taken the time to enrich and provide a superior user experience.

    The Parasite effect you mention should fall into the above if the site has done nothing but steal a lump of your content. If they have enriched it then you may have to resolve this via legal etc. which from experience is an absolute nightmare.

    Best of luck to you at ahistoryofworlds.com

    Malc
    @seomalc
    SEO Project Manager

  6. olsen jay nelson says:

    Thanks for your great response, Malcolm!

    It’s good to know that Google is more sophisticated than I’d feared about understanding the importance of value-added content despite aspects of replication. I came here after being warned about replicating anything, which seemed a bit extreme and alarmist. Still, there are plenty of things to consider around proportionality, alteration where possible/feasible, and supplementation.

    All the best,

    Olsen

  7. Mtron says:

    And there we go. Today Google rolled out Panda and the first batch of user generated spam data to all UK language properties.

    Good luck everybody!!!

Leave a Reply